Projects by Researcher

Scientific Approaches

We utilize the Family Medical History PPI survey to capture self-reported information but exclude participants who did not know any of their family history or who skipped every survey question. We pay particular attention to the disease/relative pairings that map to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics’ (ACMG) list of important diseases.

We define EHR family history information as the collection of registered tier observations with "family+history" or "FH:" anywhere in their OMOP concept name. We exclude observations of “Family social history” and remove duplicate observation and value concept pairings from the same healthcare organization regarding the same participant as these were likely due to repeated entries across multiple routine annual physical exams.

We aim to compare the data sources by summarizing the type and amount of family history information gained.

Scientific Approaches

We will select all All of Us participants who self-reported sex at birth male or female, whose self-reported race was white, black or Asian, as well as those who self-reported being Hispanics.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) will be identified from self-reports in the medical survey or from electronic health records (EHR).

Clinical factors will be identified from EHR and study measurements (blood pressure, weight, height).

We will evaluate the association of demographic (age, sex, race/ethnicity) and clinical (body mass index, blood pressure, smoking, cardiovascular diseases) factors with prevalence of self-reported AF and prevalence of AF in the EHR, as well as incident AF ascertained from the EHR.

Scientific Approaches

We plan to primarily work with EHR data contained in All of Us for a cohort of adult participants diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma. We will extract data on systemic conditions and medications for this cohort, as well as physical measurements and vital signs. We will clean the data such that the format is consistent with the data from our previously published model. Then, we will use this data as an external validation of a logistic regression model derived from our prior study that was based at a single academic center. Next, we will use All of Us data to train a new set of models, using techniques such as logistic regression, random forests, and artificial neural networks. We will optimize these models using feature selection methods and class balancing procedures. By evaluating performance metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), precision, recall, and accuracy, we will assess whether we can achieve superior predictive performance when training models using All of Us.

Scientific Approaches

We intend to select a list of SNOMED codes corresponding to primary cancers to get the subset with cancer in the medical record

We intend to select the survey question asking about self-reported cancer to get the subset with self-reported cancer

Scientific Approaches

We will identify prevalence of opioid use in two ways and stratified by state.
First, we use EHR Drug Exposures to capture use of prescription opioid.
Second, we use lifestyle survey questionnaire to capture substance use reported by patients themselves:
1. In your LIFETIME, which of the following substances have you ever used?
2. In the PAST THREE MONTHS, how often have you used this substance?
The prevalence will be stratified by state, therefore EHR Observation Table will be used to capture this information.

Scientific Approaches

In this cross-sectional, population-based study, we used All of Us baseline data from patient (age>18) provided information (PPI) surveys and electronic health record (EHR) blood pressure measurements and retrospectively examined the prevalence of hypertension in the EHR cohort using Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED codes and blood pressure medications recorded in the EHR. We used the EHR data (SNOMED codes on 2 distinct dates and at least one hypertension medication) as the primary definition, and then add subjects with elevated systolic or elevated diastolic blood pressure on measurements 2 and 3 from PPI. We extracted each participant’s detailed dates of SNOMED code for essential hypertension from the Researcher Workbench table ‘cb_search_all_events’. We calculated an age-standardized HTN prevalence according to the age distribution of the U.S. Census, using 3 groups (18-39, 40-59, ≥ 60).